Files
stack/docs/plans/reviews/2026-09-06_foundation-map-filbert-request.md
T
jason.woltje 8ebddd6f93 feat(foundation): offline synthetic scope/permission inspector (FI-FILBERT-8 APPROVED r6)
Rocko-authored, Filbert-reviewed inspector (r6 manifest
a4a44930...) with full review/build/verdict evidence under
docs/plans/reviews. 43/0 selftests, oracle zero-disagreement,
foundation checker PASS. Owner A9 acceptance recorded separately.
2026-09-07 14:06:35 -05:00

119 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown

# FM-FILBERT-1 — independent written-map review request
Owner authority: Jason explicitly said “You can have filbert review the map.”
Requester/follow-up owner: dragon-lin:darkwing.
Reviewer requested: dragon-lin:filbert, default tmux server.
Status: request prepared; transport and acknowledgement recorded separately below.
## Admission before work
Confirm you did not author/co-author the map and that this bounded review is
compatible with your existing owner-authorized assignments and scope. If not,
return a blocker; do not replace another goal, assume a new supervisory role,
or silently abandon current work. This request authorizes only this review.
## Exact candidate
Repository: /home/jwoltje/src/mosaic-stack-dev-test
Mapping commit: 7345f330fc6bfae5aa1d896c78cfb7cbe62efbae
Source/accepted-plan baseline: d4696d09eb1b5dcf1028f30db2cd63735f51cb16
Foundation parent: 44f257cb06484feda3412d9382e3587393796353
- docs/plans/2026-09-06_foundation-technical-map.md
SHA-256: 772f9e61cb9fb7a31ce8187b12cdf1c4a5fb714ad517a9c12928901171a37db1
- docs/plans/2026-09-06_foundation-map-handoff.md (MAP-HANDOFF-2)
SHA-256: 1fd1a89f982a31bb9db21b852df78be954323aa1668ab9752be34de853ee4999
Use git show at these commits, not mutable working-tree source. The handoff lists
69 SHA-256-pinned inputs. Subsequent uncommitted quiet-wait extension work belongs
to Dewey and is explicitly outside this historical candidate.
## Scope and verdict
Review the written current-versus-planned technical/component map, not a rendered
Archify deliverable. There is no architecture JSON, HTML, renderer receipt, visual
check or preview supplied. Do not certify those missing gates or label this full
Archify acceptance. Identify any limitation that prevents substantive review.
1. Open every source/plan citation at the named baseline and verify every claimed
boundary/hop, reuse/change classification and gap. Mark each confirmed, wrong
or unsupported; external behavior without measurement must remain a hypothesis.
2. Check R1-R34 coverage against requirement meaning, not table counts, including
owner intent, reassignment, cross-scope messages and independent acceptance.
3. Check pure policy versus effectful publication, package versus process authority,
current extensions/** versus future packages/*, and single runtime/adapter owners.
4. Check the small synthetic inspector's dependencies, acceptance cases and clear
separation from live grants, session control and runtime security guarantees.
5. Check identity hashes and source/plan versus mapping-commit distinctions.
6. Run relevant author/repository checks in an isolated temporary export if needed.
Do not checkout/reset this shared tree or run synchronization/native tests against
Dewey's changing installation. Report commands, baseline and measured results;
do not treat previously reported tests as your independent execution.
Return APPROVED or NOT APPROVED for the written map at the exact candidate hashes,
with per-item dispositions and numbered findings (severity, location, evidence,
required correction), test receipts and any unverified limits. A written-map
approval is neither owner acceptance nor a runtime/renderer verdict.
## Boundaries and return
Do not fix/edit the map, CURRENT, shared logs, source, policies or installations.
No commit, push, implementation, source moves, live workers or fleet investigation.
Never read credential contents. Jason's ~/.mosaic failure is only a reported negative
scenario; do not inspect or intervene in that environment.
Reply directly tagged FM-FILBERT-1 to darkwing. If a durable detailed verdict is
needed, you may create only docs/plans/reviews/2026-09-06_foundation-map-filbert-verdict.md
in this repository; report its SHA-256 and reviewed candidate hashes. No commit
is requested. No automatic timer, deadline, retry or approval is assumed.
## Transport receipt (2026-09-06 07:52 UTC)
One tools/tmux/agent-send.sh invocation targeted =filbert on the default server.
Exit 2: submission could not be confirmed. Receipt is unconfirmed, not delivered
or acknowledged. No retry or private-pane poll. Await direct FM-FILBERT-1
reply or manual owner steering; darkwing owns follow-up.
## Admission clarification (2026-09-06 08:00 UTC)
Filbert replied FM-FILBERT-1, resolving the original delivery uncertainty. He
verified candidate hashes, all 69 baseline inputs and foundation parent, but
stopped before substantive review/tests because assignment compatibility was
unestablished. His NOT APPROVED means incomplete review, not technical rejection.
He identified d4696d09's historical CURRENT.md as the uncertainty, not evidence
of an actual current competing personal assignment.
Sent FM-FILBERT-1-C1 once: source baseline is not current assignment authority;
7345f33 CURRENT.md:8-25 names the mapping review gate, subsequently authorized
by Jason's explicit request for Filbert. Asked him to establish compatibility
from his own current instructions, or return the concrete conflict/uncertainty
for Jason to resolve. No permission to cancel, inspect other agents, or reprioritize.
Clarification delivery unconfirmed (exit 2); no retry. Candidate remains unchanged.
Await FM-FILBERT-1-C1 admission/blocker; darkwing owns follow-up.
## FM-FILBERT-1 completed review (2026-09-06 08:06 UTC)
Filbert confirmed non-authorship and no competing current assignment, withdrew
the historical-CURRENT blocker and returned APPROVED for the exact written map
at 7345f33 against d4696d09. Verified verdict SHA-256
6b08c6fac0718d3db527cf9ffbfab49407e7b289d09782f5d1d0e26493eaabb3 and both
candidate hashes against committed/current map bytes. No blocking defect; five
informational findings/limits, 20 source-row and R1-R34 semantic dispositions.
Independent checks reported: 69 hashes, nine legacy identities, foundation checker,
config 24/24, syntax and mapping whitespace. Other full runtime/native/render
suites were explicitly not run by this reviewer. Earlier incomplete NOT APPROVED
is superseded, not rewritten. Owner acceptance and implementation remain gated.
Sent one non-actionable closeout; delivery unconfirmed, no reply obligation or
retry. Exact verdict remains unchanged. No commit, push or implementation.
## Owner acceptance of reviewed technical map (2026-09-06 08:07 UTC)
Jason answered "yes" to accepting the independently reviewed written map as the
technical planning baseline. Accepted mapping: 7345f330fc6bfae5aa1d896c78cfb7cbe62efbae;
source/plan baseline: d4696d09eb1b5dcf1028f30db2cd63735f51cb16.
Verified map/handoff and Filbert verdict identities unchanged. Verdict SHA-256:
6b08c6fac0718d3db527cf9ffbfab49407e7b289d09782f5d1d0e26493eaabb3.
Acceptance covers planning, not runtime/security/render proof, implementation,
migration, push or issue closure. Recommended next step: separately authorized
charter for the bounded synthetic inspector. No new phase started or commit made.