Files
stack/docs/plans/reviews/2026-09-10_gate7-final-verdict.md
T

24 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# GATE7-FINAL-FILBERT-1 — verdict
Reviewer: Filbert (independent). Author of the draft edits: Darkwing; investigation author: Rocko (PI-REFRESH-ROCKO-1). Frozen snapshot `/tmp/gate7-final-znmnih6v` at manifest SHA-256 `ea9c539d4ca030278440332fe3f1291e2494e50b475f4a2c46b35b39c290b628`, pin `224147ec…`; all four hashes verified before and after review; snapshot unchanged. Read-only: no live pi commands, no package fetches, no private reads.
## Verdict: APPROVED
Committing exactly these four reviewed files is approved. This closes gate 7 as documentation; it authorizes no implementation, package change, or credential operation.
## Findings by assigned check
1. **Draft deltas confined.** Against pin `224147ec…`, the registry draft changes only: the mechanics-section sentence resolving the refresh trigger via PI-REFRESH-ROCKO-1 with owner approval; the refresh-driver paragraph inside the verification/suites bullet list; gate 7 moving PARTIALLY RESOLVED → RESOLVED (owner, 2026-09-10, mechanism (a)); and the remaining-open-item text. Nothing else moved.
2. **Investigation consistent, cited, and corroborated.** The 0.85.1 claims are internally consistent (shasum `4cd00f65…` appears identically in three places; the `refresh: false` function default vs `refresh: !noRefresh` CLI wiring contradiction is explicitly reconciled; the two independent 5-minute layers — stored-value safety margin and read-time validity window — are explained coherently; the browser/PKCE login flow is correctly separated from the POST-only refresh). Citations name concrete files and unique anchors. Because the investigation itself establishes the capability as pre-existing since 0.83.0/0.84.1, I corroborated read-only against this repository's pinned 0.84.4 install: the same command set (`check`/`print-api-key`/`print-bearer-token`/`--no-refresh`), the verbatim help sentence, the `0o600`/`proper-lockfile`/read-only-refusal anchors in `auth-storage.js`, the refresh timeout constant, and the Anthropic token URL all exist locally as described. One claim the investigation supports only by inference — that `pi auth check` produces no credential output — is corroborated by the pinned package's own help text: "`--credentials` emits the credential," i.e. only on explicit opt-in. Limit recorded honestly: I could not re-derive the 0.85.1-specific evidence (no fetches permitted); the tarball identity rests on the investigation's recorded npm outputs, and my corroboration covers the shared pre-existing behavior.
3. **Mechanism (a) matches the findings.** The owner-selected `pi auth check --provider <p>` is exactly the entry point the investigation verifies as noninteractive, refresh-if-expiring (5-minute default window), no browser/TTY, with the in-place locked `auth.json` rewrite; `print-*` exclusion matches their documented credential-export semantics.
4. **No gate silently moved.** Gates 16 and 810 read RESOLVED at the pin and are unchanged; only gate 7 changed, per the owner's Q15(a) ruling. The new remaining-open text ("none — all gates resolved; implementation needs a separately chartered increment") states the boundary correctly and infers no implementation authority.
5. **No credential material or new identifiers.** The candidates contain no secrets; the investigation records only a public token URL, package digests, and code anchors. The UUID hits in SESSIONS.md are baseline published history; the added registration line carries none.
## Condition
Commit exactly the four reviewed units at manifest `ea9c539d…`. Any byte change, including any later 0.85.1 pin bump or refresh-service work, requires its own chartered and reviewed increment.