ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
Both the orchestrator and the coordinator read D-14 as forward propagation only: a ruling reaches the documents stating the new rule. D-20 proved that insufficient — when D-19 superseded part of D-18, the consequence went forward into the charter and the delivery conditions but never backward into D-18, which kept asserting a withdrawn claim until a reviewer disproved it by experiment. A supersession must update BOTH the documents rendering the new rule AND the finding it retires, with the retired wording quoted rather than deleted. Interim rule updated accordingly. Applying D-14's own rule to D-14, in the same commit that records the amendment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>