Files
stack/docs/remediation/BOARD.md
T
mos-dt-0andClaude Opus 5 b413bf9f88 docs(remediation): D-38c — PR metadata failed a THIRD time on #1033; delivery-issue gap ruled
Merge-gate NO-GO with every code and CI gate verified, including the --expect-commit machine-check it
was told to exercise (9/9 JSON, exempted_steps 0, expected_commit == commit). The blocker was the body:
only "Refs #1000", no "Closes #N", and Mosaic completion requires a linked issue closed.

Third distinct metadata failure on one PR — missing commit binding, then a stale DO-NOT-MERGE body
describing a dead head, now an incomplete link. Each time the code was fine and the metadata was
unbound, stale, or incomplete. Nothing re-binds PR metadata to the head or checks it for completeness
until a gate does, and by then it costs a round trip.

The subtlety that makes it a real ruling: #1033 must NOT Closes #1000. The teardown defect stays open,
and #1000 is the exemption's own retirement trigger — auto-closing it would delete the retirement
trigger for the workaround being merged, turning a bounded exemption into a permanent one by side
effect. Hence a delivery issue distinct from the defect issue: #1034, with Closes #1034 added and
Refs #1000 kept.

Metadata-only, head never moved: verified by read-back that head is still 57cae04f, Closes #1034
present, Refs #1000 present, Closes #1000 ABSENT, review 70 still CURRENT with zero live
REQUEST_CHANGES, #1034 open. coder-mos1 stayed parked; nobody pushed.

Process gap ruled by Mos: every remediation delivery PR needs a delivery issue to Close, created at
OPEN-TIME rather than discovered at gate-time. #1032 already Closes #1019; #1033 had none.

Both provider writes went through the tea->API fallback — the same path that silently dropped #1033's
draft property at creation — so both were read back and verified by property, not by exit code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-08-01 09:47:33 -05:00

8.0 KiB
Raw Blame History

mos-remediation — LIVE BOARD (keep < 8 KB)

Phase: EXECUTING — RM-03 at owner-merge; RM-02 blocked on RM-61; RM-61 GATE-READY, at Mos. Updated: 2026-08-01 — seam crossed; successor seat resumed, attested from the files, and is driving. ⚠ That was a MANUAL pane respawn (prior seat ~803k tokens): it validates the checkpoint+rehydration design, NOT a lifecycle mechanism — P-LIFECYCLE rotation does not exist yet (D-41 / RM-62).

Head

  • Charter + 15 decisions + 4-build plan: MISSION.md. Backlog + all findings: TASKS.md.
  • Planning DONE (58 tasks, P0P5). DECISION-1/2/3 all RULED by Mos 2026-07-31 (TASKS.md §5) — nothing is waiting on a decision. D-2's availability target is Jason-pending and non-blocking.
  • Executing, not planning. RM-01 is MERGED; three lanes are live (see In-flight).
  • Orchestrator seat mos-remediation LIVE, owns the mission, resumed across the rotation seam 2026-08-01 and re-attested to Mos from the files. Residency attestation: PASS.

In-flight

Task Owner State
RM-01 checkout MERGED f58b3699 (#1027)
RM-03 queue guard Jason GO @ 78ec47cd (cmt 20392) — HELD FOR OWNER MERGE. Head unmoved; GO commit-bound, VOID if it moves — do not push #1032
RM-02 registry ★key BLOCKED on RM-61. Complete @ f9746b23, head FROZEN, 2 live REQUEST_CHANGES. ci-postgres FAIL on #2187 and #2188
RM-61 CI exemption MOS NO-GO cleared @ 57cae04f — gate flagged missing Closes; delivery issue #1034 filed + linked, head NEVER moved, review 70 still CURRENT. Re-gate requested
RM-59 / RM-60 Jason (infra) tracked deps; RM-60 option B
#1023 queue attempt Jason SUPERSEDED-PENDING-JASON — live REQUEST_CHANGES, do not merge

For the incoming orchestrator — read this before acting

  1. Nothing is waiting on you that is urgent. RM-03 waits on Jason; RM-61 is gate-ready and waits on Mos; RM-02 unblocks once RM-61 merges. Read the record before touching any lane.
  2. docs/remediation/TASKS.md is authoritative, not the newest voice in a chat. It holds 42 findings (D-1…D-6 in BOARD-LEDGER.md, D-7…D-41 + D-38c in TASKS.md), every ruling with its rationale, and the requirements each finding placed on RM-02/RM-34/RM-50/RM-55.
  3. MISSION.md carries five first-class principles, all earned by live failures — observe the property not the proxy · pre-registration prevents retrofitting and nothing else · never ship an integrity claim dressed as a property · when a property cannot exist at its layer, bound it and track the real guarantee · query for refutation, never for confirmation · redundant observation on evidence-bearing steps.
  4. Seat identity: export MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY=<seat> is stripped by a context reset (D-34) — every dispatch/rehydration brief must re-export it, or the seat cannot use its credentials.
  5. Scan CI from -f json, never default text — text mode omits clone (D-33). State counts.
  6. The queue guard is zero-information until RM-03 merges (D-23) — never cite its green.
  7. The bounded CI re-roll used on RM-02 was a one-time stopgap, NOT policy. A per-PR free re-roll is D-21 normalisation. Do not repeat it; RM-61 is the fix.

Delivery gates — REFERENCE, do not restate

Canonical: ~/.config/mosaic/fleet/roles.local/merge-gate.md (verdict authority) + ~/.config/mosaic/fleet/roles/validator.md. Order and the freeze/zero-information rules: MISSION.md and KICKSTART.md. Read them there — restating the gate from memory is how the merge-gate step went missing from mission setup twice, once inside the correction for it (D-26).

Fleet seats

  • mos-remediation — project orchestrator (Claude, /src/mosaic-stack, socket mosaic-fleet) — ACTIVE
  • planner-opus — adversarial planner (robustness), Opus 5, socket default — DELIVERED, idle
  • planner-sol — adversarial planner (pragmatic), gpt-5.6-sol, socket default — DELIVERED, idle
  • rev-974 — mosaicstack reviewer identity (id 16, write:repository) — idle, on call
  • Mos (mos-claude) — lead coordinator, socket default — relay path to Jason

Gate status

  • Freeze: LIFTED for this workstream only.
  • Git identity: orchestrator runs MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY=mos-dt-0 INTERIM. Mos ruled gate-16 HOLDS (author≠reviewer is what gate-16 protects; rev-974 reviews, mos-dt-0 never self-reviews). Dedicated identity TRACKED, Mos provisions.
  • Capability is per-path (D-11b → superseded in part by D-13/D-15): a token file is necessary, not sufficient. Three layers — token file (raw-API), tea login (tea paths), repository permission (writes). Before dispatch, assert permissions.push == true as that seat, not token existence and not a 200 on a read. Mos owns provisioning; escalate missing pairs.
  • Seat identity (D-11a): token identity AND git config user.name/user.email must BOTH be set and agree. Exporting MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY alone does NOT fix commit authorship.
  • LIVE HAZARD (D-37) — one shared .git/config re-identifies EVERY worktree at once. Every seat, including rev-974's review worktree, currently authors as coder-mos1; MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY does not override it. STANDING ORDER: commit with explicit git -c user.name=<seat> -c user.email=<seat>@…, and NOBODY rewrites the shared config mid-flight. Real fix authorised, Mos owns it, sequenced at a quiet seam. #1024 implicated. Detail: D-37.
  • Standing worker-brief doctrine (mandatory in EVERY brief): re-export MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY (D-34); commit early/WIP (D-31); don't weaken a RED test to pass; if a check is unrunnable SAY SO, never substitute; agent-send -f never -m; artifacts off shared /tmp; scan CI from -f json (D-33); relay observations into an open review, NEVER your own conclusion on an open check (D-39); the author never adjudicates their own PR's blocker status — surface evidence, prepare the fix, hold.
  • Remote control: native /remote-control NOT wired in this runtime. Path is Mos-relay (Jason ↔ mos-claude via Discord ↔ mos-remediation via agent-send). Not a blocker.

Sequencing — see MISSION.md

Builds 1-5, the cross-cutting retirements, and DECISION-1's corrected wire-in target are stated once in the charter and TASKS.md §5. Not repeated here — the previous copy of DECISION-1's status on this board is one of the six stale restatements below.

Decisions log — full record in TASKS.md

All 42 findings (D-1…D-6 in BOARD-LEDGER.md, D-7…D-41 + D-38c in TASKS.md) and every ruling with its rationale live there. Not duplicated here — a second copy is a second thing to go stale, which this board had done three times in one night (gate list, capability registry, DECISION-1 status), and three more times by the next rotation seam (RM-61 "building", "nothing implemented yet", DECISION-1/2/3 "must be ruled"). The rulings a fresh seat needs are items 47 above; they are not repeated here, because that repetition is what went stale.