TASK-1 complete. planner-opus (robustness, 38 tasks/8 dissents) and planner-sol
(pragmatic, 25 tasks/10 defers/7 dissents) each decomposed the 4-build plan without
seeing the other's work. Both decomps are committed alongside the reconciliation so
the disagreements stay auditable rather than being flattened into a consensus.
Reconciled into 58 tasks across P0-P5 (docs/remediation/TASKS.md):
- 7 independent convergences, treated as settled because neither planner could see
the other. The headline: BOTH reject the charter's wire-in point
(mosaic_orchestrator.py::run_single_task) because that controller is disabled and
references a dispatcher absent from this checkout — wiring it would produce a
stranded executor, the same built-but-unwired disease one layer up.
- 7 genuine disagreements ADJUDICATED, not averaged. The cost estimates are ~18x
apart; rather than split the difference, the plan adopts sol's scope with opus's
rigor and treats the first-dogfood gate as a hard budget checkpoint.
- 3 decisions escalated (wire-in point, rollback artifact + availability trade,
queue-guard ownership vs parked PR #1023). No task blocked on them is dispatched.
Keystone dogfood case recorded (TASKS.md 1a): merged PR #868 shipped a file failing
pnpm format:check, then an unrelated PR reformatted it as a side effect, so main went
green and the gate's failure to fire left no trace. Detection must therefore be
per-merge-commit against that commit's own tree.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
