Registered at fbb61912 before any reviewer read the diff. I reproduced three things first so the review
does not re-spend on them: the derived boundary equals an independently computed git merge-base HEAD
origin/main (f4fd5967 — the same value f10-coder once set by hand, now derived rather than asserted);
emptying the registry populations fails with the precondition's own language; the both-directions
bootstrap statement is present with the Builds 1-2 residual.
A1 and P2 are the sharp ones and they ask the same question the last two rounds answered badly: did the
fix REMOVE the author's control point or MOVE it? A1 — refs/remotes/origin/main is a local ref; who
controls it where the gate runs, and can an author rewrite remote.origin.url or craft that ref in their
own clone? P2 — the seven required gate IDs are an anchor list; if the author can edit it, that is D-45
one level in. A4 asks about the natural failure mode of this fix, over-inclusion causing false reds.
P3 independently confirms the production fixture-profile bypass the author found and removed in their
own pre-commit review — self-disclosed, so it gets verified rather than credited.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
